Description: AI-powered web accessibility vendors allegedly overstated to customers about their products' utility for people with disabilities, falsely claiming to deliver automated compliance solutions.
Entités
Voir toutes les entitésPrésumé : Un système d'IA développé et mis en œuvre par accessiBe , Accessus.ai , Allyable , UserWay and MaxAccess.io, endommagé internet users with disabilities and web accessibility vendors' customers.
Statistiques d'incidents
ID
148
Nombre de rapports
1
Date de l'incident
2021-11-21
Editeurs
Sean McGregor, Khoa Lam
Applied Taxonomies
Classifications de taxonomie CSETv1
Détails de la taxonomieIncident Number
The number of the incident in the AI Incident Database.
148
Classifications de taxonomie CSETv1_Annotator-1
Détails de la taxonomieIncident Number
The number of the incident in the AI Incident Database.
148
Classifications de taxonomie CSETv1_Annotator-2
Détails de la taxonomieIncident Number
The number of the incident in the AI Incident Database.
148
Special Interest Intangible Harm
An assessment of whether a special interest intangible harm occurred. This assessment does not consider the context of the intangible harm, if an AI was involved, or if there is characterizable class or subgroup of harmed entities. It is also not assessing if an intangible harm occurred. It is only asking if a special interest intangible harm occurred.
yes
Date of Incident Year
The year in which the incident occurred. If there are multiple harms or occurrences of the incident, list the earliest. If a precise date is unavailable, but the available sources provide a basis for estimating the year, estimate. Otherwise, leave blank.
Enter in the format of YYYY
2021
Estimated Date
“Yes” if the data was estimated. “No” otherwise.
Yes
Multiple AI Interaction
“Yes” if two or more independently operating AI systems were involved. “No” otherwise.
yes
Embedded
“Yes” if the AI is embedded in a physical system. “No” if it is not. “Maybe” if it is unclear.
no